Saxilby

An investigation into the care of an elderly man with dementia found he had been left in the same position for “at least 13 hours” and had suffered serious injuries during a 12-month stay at a care home.

The pensioner, believed to be from Nottinghamshire, was sent to The Old Rectory care home in Saxilby, Lincolnshire, in summer 2019 after arriving from hospital for interim care.

Nottinghamshire County Council agreed on funding for him to remain there as a long-term resident.

However, about a year later he was unexpectedly admitted to hospital before the council received a referral letter stating concerns over the care he received.

Because the care home was not in Nottinghamshire, a safeguarding assessment was conducted by Lincolnshire County Council.

Assessments found the man suffered “substantive injury” during the 12-month stay in the home and was caused “serious but unintentional neglect” due to failures over his care plan.

It was found staff failed to give him “appropriate food and drink”, did not identify his injuries, and the assessment recommended disciplinary proceedings for staff at the home.

The Old Rectory self-referred to the Care Quality Commission before launching both internal and external investigations, as well as disciplinary action against at least four staff members.

In a separate statement, the home confirmed a number of staff members have been dismissed and reviews of its practice have taken place.

A report by the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman was reviewed by Nottinghamshire County Council on Thursday, November 11.

It found the man, named only as Mr Y, suffered an injured and bleeding toe and toenail, pressure sores, swelling from head to toe on his right side, 23 skin tears, a high temperature and possible dehydration while at the home.

In its assessment, the ombudsman accepted the care provider admitting it was at fault but deemed its care caused “significant and avoidable harm” to Mr Y.

The ombudsman did not find the council at fault, though it recommended the authority arrange for The Old Rectory to provide a “suitable apology” to Mrs Y.

The home has insisted it has issued an apology, but the report says Mr Y’s relative “has not seen this” and therefore another should be sent.

It added the council should issue its own apology, setting out actions taken or due to be taken via its role as the safeguarding authority.

The council was also told that, when receiving a safeguarding enquiry about someone placed in an out-of-county home, it should “follow up to ensure it is involved where appropriate”.

The report adds the authority should ensure it “receives information about what happened” so it can properly support the person and their family.

These recommendations have been agreed upon by the council.

Commenting in Thursday’s governance and ethics meeting, Councillor Michael Payne, who represents Arnold North, described the report as a “shocking read”.

He added: “It must have been a horrific situation for the family.”

Councillor Philip Owen , chairman of the committee, added he was “quite shocked” when reading the ombudsman report.

He said: “I know we as a council were not directly involved, but I remain concerned that we [should] follow up safeguarding enquiries about one of our residents as soon as possible.

“We’ve heard assurances this will not happen again in the future.”

A spokesperson for The Old Rectory issued a statement describing it as an “isolated case”, outlining action it has taken since the investigation.

They said: “The home’s management ensured that the correct authorities were immediately informed of the issues as soon as they became aware of the incident and swiftly appointed external investigators to conduct a thorough review.

“As a result of that review, some members of staff were dismissed.

“As the ombudsman’s report has acknowledged we acted promptly, issued an apology to the family and have taken robust steps to stop similar problems happening in the future.”

Picture the scene: you’re about to order a delivery to your house, and the address you give is “Fatty Bum Bum Street”. Well, according to Google Maps, that’s what one side street in the village of Saxilby near Lincoln is called.

A driveway which has three houses alongside it on Westcroft Drive in Saxilby is officially part of that street, but an amusing name has appeared on Google Maps to give it its own identity.

Those three houses, unofficially, are now situated on “fatty bum bum”, and it is unclear as to how and why it was given this name.

Fatty bum bum is on Westcroft Drive, and you can add that to the list of sentences I never dreamed of typing. | Photo: The Lincolnite

There is no road sign in place, but anyone who goes on Google Maps can find the street in question by simply typing “fatty bum bum Saxilby”. No, genuinely, try it.

I wonder who lives at the unlucky three houses on fatty bum bum. | Photo: Google Maps

The road sign for Westcroft Drive is heavily covered by overgrown bushes, so maybe a new name was needed all along? Who knows.

Westcroft Drive’s road sign is hardly visible, so maybe the whole street should be called “fatty bum bum” as well? | Photo: The Lincolnite

One thing we do know is that this is highly amusing, if not a bit confusing.

The Lincolnite has contacted West Lindsey District Council for a comment, but are yet to receive a reply.

Of course we also wanted to try to speak to people living on “Fatty bum bum” Street, but nobody was willing to come on the record.