October 21, 2016 10.50 am
This story is over 85 months old
Lincolnshire Talks: Who should have the final say on the terms of Brexit?
“Brexit means Brexit” Prime Minister Theresa May has become fond of telling us. Despite her repeated insistence that she will not provide “a running commentary” on negotiations to leave the European Union, this has not stopped the media and politicians from all political parties speculating on what Brexit will mean for the UK. Debate has…
MPs Stephen Phillips (Sleaford and North Hykeham), Sir Edward Leigh (Gainsborough), Matt Warman (Boston and Skegness), and Nic Dakin (Scunthorpe) give their thoughts on who should control negotiating the terms of Brexit
“Brexit means Brexit” Prime Minister Theresa May has become fond of telling us. Despite her repeated insistence that she will not provide “a running commentary” on negotiations to leave the European Union, this has not stopped the media and politicians from all political parties speculating on what Brexit will mean for the UK.
Debate has switched over the last two weeks to who should actually control the terms of Brexit, and how much of a say Parliament should have in this process.
Earlier this week, Downing Street indicated that MPs would probably be granted a vote on the final Brexit agreement, expected in 2019 after two years of negotiations.
However, campaigners have been calling for a vote before Article 50 is triggered, in theory by the end of March 2017.
Stephen Phillips has been MP for Sleaford and North Hykeham since 2010
Phillips, who voted Leave in the referendum, said that he had not voted to restore the sovereignty of the UK Parliament for the government to ignore the views of MPs in the House of Commons.
He said: “The referendum result gives the government no authority or mandate to adopt a negotiating position without reference to the wishes of the House and those of the British people expressed through their elected representatives.”
Following this, Lincolnshire Reporter caught up with other MPs from all ends of Greater Lincolnshire, representing both the Conservatives and Labour, and who voted different ways in the referendum.
Here is what they had to say.
Improper to reverse democratic decision
Gainsborough MP Sir Edward Leigh. Photo: Steve Smailes for Lincolnshire Reporter
Veteran Gainsborough MP Sir Edward Leigh took a different view to his Lincolnshire Conservative colleague, stating that he fully supports the government’s position.
He said: “The prime minister has committed to respecting the will of the majority of British people who voted in the referendum in June for Brexit.
“We know she has said that by the end of March 2017 the government will have triggered Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty and the UK leaving the EU will be locked in.
“It is right that Parliament should scrutinise and hold the government to account on the important issue of Brexit.
“It would however be improper to attempt to reverse the democratic decision taken in the referendum, or reveal our negotiating position in advance of negotiations.”
Boston and Skegness MP Matt Warman
This view has been broadly shared by Boston and Skegness MP Matt Warman, who voted Remain, unlike lifelong Eurosceptic Leigh.
Warman said: “It’s important parliament scrutinises the process of the UK leaving the EU, but politicians also need to accept that, whatever their personal preferences, nothing should stand in the way of Britain leaving without unnecessary delay.”
We must make sure we do not lose out
Scunthorpe MP Nic Dakin
Labour MP for Scunthorpe Nic Dakin, a Remain voter, said that the people had voted for the UK Parliament to assert its sovereignty.
He said: “It would be really strange in the light of that if Parliament does not proper scrutiny including a vote on the terms of the UK’s exit from the EU.
“I believe it’s important to deliver the will of the British people. We know we are leaving the EU but we have a responsibility to make sure that we come out but do not lose out.”
Who should control the terms of Brexit? The government? Parliament? The British people? Email [email protected] with your thoughts.
Stefan is the Local Democracy Reporter covering Greater Lincolnshire. You can contact him directly with your news via email at [email protected]
The Lincolnite welcomes your views. All comments are reactively-moderated and must obey the house rules. Please stay on topic and be respectful of other readers.
The Home Office has told RAF Scampton residents that they will not be notified when asylum seekers are moved onto the former airbase in order to avoid public pushback.
At a public engagement meeting for vulnerable people held at the Lincolnshire Showground on Thursday, it was conveyed to attendees that the timing of the migrants’ relocation will be kept undisclosed, due to concerns about potential public pushback.