David Harding-Price

By David Harding-Price davidhardingprice

April 2nd will see the second TV debate between Lib Dem leader and Deputy Prime Minister, Nick Clegg, and the leader of UKIP, Nigel Farage. The battle of ‘in versus out’ may be a political spectacle for some, but the issues it will address mean so much more to the future of our country.

The main reason the Lib Dems want us to remain in Europe is to protect British jobs. Only by securing jobs can we create a stronger economy.

Last week’s debate was a lively and clear contrast between Clegg and Farage. However, this debate turned into more than just whether you think Britain is better off in or out of the European Union. This was also about what sort of country we want to be.

Do we want to be a modern, open, tolerant and diverse country that is co-operative with its neighbours and comfortable in the 21st century world, or do we want to be an isolated, divided and fearful country? I know which side I’m on.

The Centre for Economic and Business Research (CEBR) has estimated that 4 million jobs are linked to exports to the EU. In the North and Midlands, nearly 1 in 6 jobs are related to the EU in some way. By threatening to pull out of the EU, UKIP and the Conservatives are playing roulette with jobs, jeopardising billions of pounds of investment and could lead to the decimation of our recovering economy.

On our doorstep, here in Lincoln, one of our largest employers, Siemens, announced in 2013 that if Britain left the EU, they would find it difficult to continue to invest in their UK factories.

The money European businesses spend in Lincoln contributes to our local economy and creates employment opportunities in our city, to put that at risk would be a massive step backwards. Other firms, which employ hundreds of thousands of people in the UK, such as Nissan, Kellogg’s, Tata Steel, BT, Vodafone and DHL, have all shown their support for staying in the EU.

UKIP say that by leaving the EU, the UK can still have a trading relationship with the other countries individually, like the Norwegians and Swiss have currently. That is true, but has one very large flaw: the UK would still need to abide to all the EU standards and law but have no input into those whatsoever. We would still have to pay large sums of money to the EU for this pleasure. Even the Norwegian Prime Minster has warned us not to follow their example.

By being part of the EU, we have 500 million people that we can openly and freely trade with. This facilitates business growth, therefore creating more jobs and improving the economy, which improves all our lives. Being in the EU also gives us tremendous influence and clout when we negotiate trade deals with major economies such as the US, China, Brazil and India.

By being alone in Europe, we would lose a substantial amount of leverage created by many nations working together. For example, Iceland, as a non-EU country, has recently finished negotiations on a free trade agreement with China, but it took them close to six years to reach. UK business cannot afford that length of time to reach agreements in a globally competitive market.

Don’t wait for a referendum. Use May’s elections to say you are IN. If you want to show your support for staying in the EU on twitter, use #whyIamIN

David is a retired NHS nurse, but is currently the Royal College of Nursing’s Council Member for the East Midlands and is Honorary Treasurer of the RCN. David was also a Lib Dem MP candidate for Lincoln in the past. He has two grown up children and enjoys photography and swimming in his spare time.

By David Harding-Price davidhardingprice

With the glorious spring sunshine and rising temperatures we have experienced over these past two weekends, it seems hard to remember what the weather was doing this time last year. In March 2013, the UK was in the grip of an icy spell which put much of the UK in a thick covering of snow. It just goes to show how crazy the British weather can be — or is there much more to the extremes of the UK weather patterns that we have been seeing in recent years?

Could climate change be already affecting the weather of our planet, and should we act accordingly when looking at the housing crisis we are facing?

All of us have been touched by the plight of those who have felt the effects of this winter’s extreme flooding in the UK; from the Somerset levels and Thames Valley, to the coastal North Lincolnshire villages and the regions along the south coast that have been battered by tide surge and storm after storm. This really should be a wakeup call to us all in terms of building on floodplains.

Maybe the answer to building on floodplains lies in a different type of structure than the traditional brick-built houses we as a nation are so taken with. The answer could lie with houses built off the ground on stilts similar to those found in Queensland, Australia. This would give houses the advantage of being high off the ground allowing any floodwater to pass under without causing substantial damage to the property.

This does not mean that flood prevention schemes should not be put in place as well, but it does reduce the risk to properties that could be in harm’s way in those once in every 100 year flood events when the prevention schemes might be overwhelmed.

The Liberal Democrats recognise that there is a housing crisis, and have committed to building 300,000 homes every year. This, however, does not even touch the surface on the housing needs of the future.

If we are serious about providing homes for our children and grandchildren, we need to think differently about the types of houses we build. By adapting to the needs created by building on floodplains, we are lessening the risk posed by the potential rising waters and sparing families the misery of seeing their lives turned upside-down.

We also must start to use the brown field sites that are standing empty and derelict. Many of these sites could provide secure housing solutions for young families and be socially developed to meet the needs of a local community.

We do not know how the weather will affect us in the future. All we can do is look at how the present is changing – more flash floods after torrential downpours, more storms with heavy prolonged rain and wild seas battering coastlines.

All we can do is make the best preparations we can to protect ourselves for the future.

Also read:

• DEFRA minister: Careful building on Lincoln’s floodplains
• Ric Metcalfe: The Western Growth Corridor is a critical development opportunity

David is a retired NHS nurse, but is currently the Royal College of Nursing’s Council Member for the East Midlands and is Honorary Treasurer of the RCN. David was also a Lib Dem MP candidate for Lincoln in the past. He has two grown up children and enjoys photography and swimming in his spare time.