Avatar photo

John Marriott

Columnist

John was a councillor for thirty years, finally retiring in 2017. A schoolteacher by profession, he served on the North Hykeham Town Council (1987-2011), the North Kesteven District Council (1987-1999, 2001-2007) and the Lincolnshire County Council (2001-2017). He was also a County Council member of the former Lincolnshire Police Authority for eight years until standing down in 2009. In 1997 he was the Lib Dem Parliamentary candidate for Sleaford and North Hykeham. He is currently not a member of any political party.


At the end of his victory speech, Conservative candidate Douglas Hogg surveyed the blue rosettes in the Sleaford Sports Centre in the early hours of Friday, 2 May 1997 and, with a certain smile on his clearly relieved face, uttered the following words; “You know, Tories always win in the end”. He had just taken the newly created Parliamentary seat of Sleaford and North Hykeham with a majority of around 5,000 over his youthful Blairite opponent Sean Harriss, with yours truly representing the Liberal Democrats, a distant, but respectable third on just over 8,000 votes. Mr Hogg’s total of just over 23,000 represented just under 44% of the votes cast and was the lowest percentage so far achieved by a Tory in this constituency. Despite the clearly anticipated Blair landslide in most of the country, blue triumphed as usual in rural Lincolnshire, if not in the county town.

After ten years as a councillor in local government, this was my one and only attempt at becoming an MP. Having been granted a month’s leave of absence with pay by my school’s generous governing body, I set off, invariably alone, on what was the fairly lonely task of delivering leaflets and meeting the odd resident in well over 40 communities of varying size dotted around a massive mainly rural constituency. It was pretty clear from the people I met that many were seriously thinking of not voting Tory in this election and their standard question was “Who came second last time?” As most areas, with the exception of North Hykeham, had been in the old Grantham constituency in 1992, I had to answer “Labour”.

So in 1997 Blair and Labour got their landslide on just over 43% of the popular vote and, despite a few noble gestures, left office thirteen years later with a massive debt which, while not entirely of its own making, was largely because of its being mesmerised by big business, the City and the markets. What a massive opportunity it missed to produce a written constitution, pass a Bill of Rights, reform Parliament, devolve real power to the English regions and reform local government there, as they did for Scotland and, to a lesser extent, Wales and Northern Ireland and, above all, to introduce fair votes.

What a change from the 1983 general election the 1997 Election had been, when a genuinely left leaning Labour Party under a divisive leader with a radical socialist manifesto, was slaughtered by a Thatcher led Tory Party, fresh from the ‘triumph’ in the South Atlantic and aided by the SDP/Liberal Alliance Party, which, whilst failing to win many seats, thanks to our iniquitous voting system, nevertheless deprived Labour of a significant and arguably decisive number of votes.

In 1982, when the newly formed SDP was achieving opinion poll results of over 50% and Labour appeared to be on its knees, Peter Zentner, who went on to become the SDP/Liberal Alliance candidate for Lincoln in 1987, wrote a book called; ‘Social Democracy in Britain: Must Labour lose?’. He was right to ask the question because, under Kinnock, Hattersley and Smith, the Labour Party managed to claw its way back to the centre ground for Blair to put the icing on the cake 14 years later.

Well, here we are some 37 years after Labour’s second worst performance in a general election since it became a major force after WW1 (the worst was in 1935). Whereas it was probably the Falklands War, an unpopular leader and that infamous ‘suicide note’ manifesto that did for Labour back then, the only difference this time was the first reason. However, for ‘Falklands War’ substitute instead ‘Brexit’. What is even worse this time is that Labour really can’t blame the ‘third party’, whose potential vote was relentlessly squeezed by both Itself and the Tories in the final weeks of the 2019 campaign.

There will be leadership elections for both Labour and the Lib Dems next year, but whoever wins must face the fact that Boris Johnson and his party have enough wriggle room to do more or less what they want for the next few years. They are in that position because they suckered the opposition parties into voting for a third general election in four years. It could have been avoided, but we are where we are. Yes, leadership is important and any non Tory party needs someone with the charisma to carry off the job. There is no doubt that, in a choice between two ‘marmite’ characters that was presented in this recent election, this basically Conservative country of ours would always go for its own.

With the possible exception of Lincoln, the rest of the county will continue to remain a no go area for any of the opposition parties. It couldn’t be breached back in 1997 so I can’t see it happening in the near future. Change will have to occur elsewhere, if it occurs at all. At the moment, and, dare I say for the foreseeable future, the only effective opposition in the House of Commons is likely to come from north of the border. Will either Labour or the Lib Dems get their act together? For Labour there is no evidence that Momentum will fold as easily as Militant did in the 1980s. In any case, what gives the party the right to assume that voters, who might eventually become frustrated with Johnson’s government will automatically turn to it? Socialism, or at least the Labour version of it, has been decisively rejected twice now in the past 36 years.

As for the Lib Dems, and, to a lesser extent, the Green Party, if they continue to put all their eggs into the EU basket, whatever progressive ideas they may have in other areas, they do not deserve to succeed. Any new party emerging out the Labour and the Lib Dems, not forgetting those Tories, who fell foul of Johnson before the last election, will, like the SDP before it, come up against the same problem, namely our ‘First Past The Post’ voting system.

So let’s hope that 2020 resolves a few issues because, for the sake of our having a viable democracy into the future, we desperately need an effective and sensible opposition to the present government. The main task for all parties at Westminster next year has got to be, despite what some may say, to make Brexit as painless as possible. Then perhaps we might all be able to move on to deal with such matters as housing, health and social care provision.

There is still much we could achieve ourselves to make our country a fairer and better place in which to live without blaming everything on EU membership or, as some in Labour would claim, on capitalism. Does it really have to be, as Douglas Hogg, now the second Lord Hailsham, said in that early morning speech over 22 years ago, that “Tories always win in the end”?

John was a councillor for thirty years, finally retiring in 2017. A schoolteacher by profession, he served on the North Hykeham Town Council (1987-2011), the North Kesteven District Council (1987-1999, 2001-2007) and the Lincolnshire County Council (2001-2017). He was also a County Council member of the former Lincolnshire Police Authority for eight years until standing down in 2009. In 1997 he was the Lib Dem Parliamentary candidate for Sleaford and North Hykeham. He is currently not a member of any political party.

Our decrepit system of government both at national and local level is in urgent need of reform. Are we finally ready to change it?

Let me start by saying that this article is not about Brexit. However, Brexit, or rather how we deal with it, has called into question whether our political institutions are still fit for purpose. This would not be the first time that I have written on this subject over the years and it probably won’t be the last.

In the past, my musings were largely brushed aside. It’s not surprising that most people have got on with leading their lives, with little or no interest in politics of any kind. You only need to look at the turnouts in elections, both local and national, in recent years to see that many members of the public view politicians of all parties with a kind of disdain or even, following the expenses scandal and the failure to get to grips with you know what, with contempt. It would be hard to blame them.

The present state of British politics was summed up for me by the sight, a few weeks ago, of the Leader of the House of Commons, Jacob Rees Mogg MP (often referred to as ‘the Hon Member for the 18th Century) languidly lolling in his over large double breasted suit across the front bench during that late night Commons debate.

Whatever happens to our country over the next few crucial months, if we do emerge with a semblance of order, we really have got to do something about the way we are governed.

Let’s start with our so called Constitution. It’s ‘unwritten’, which means it’s evolved over centuries into a series of ‘conventions’, which are subject to interpretation. The cynic might say that it’s therefore a case of “make it up as you go along”. It needs to catch up with the 21st Century so it needs to be codified, in other words written down.

So, let’s start with a Speaker’s Conference and a Citizens’ Assembly to examine how it could be done. Then we need our own Bill of Rights to replace the 1689 version, which only covers England and Wales. It created our Constitutional Monarchy. We may wish to review that as well, although, while the Queen is alive, I do not detect much of an appetite for a President Blair or May!

Then there is the role of Parliament and its members. Many people, when they go to vote in a General Election, assume that they are voting for a government. They are, in theory, voting for someone to represent them in Parliament. When elected, that person is duty bound to represent all their electorate, regardless of whether or not they voted for them.

Despite some people expecting their MP to do their bidding, I still adhere to what Anglo Irish statesman, Edmund Burke said to the voters of Bristol in 1774; “Your representative owes you, not his industry only, but his judgment; and he betrays instead of serving you if he sacrifices it to your opinion.”

To put it simply, according to Burke, a Member of Parliament is not a delegate but is duty bound to represent all their constituents to the best of their ability. I tend to agree with this. As for how an MP is elected, it is clear to many people that the present First Past the Post voting system is not delivering any more and needs to be changed to reflect what is today a more sophisticated electorate. If this results in more coalition government, then so be it. After all, a country like Germany, which has only had one majority government since World War Two, is hardly suffering from this fact.

Finally, we need to sort out local government, particularly in England. I have advocated a system of Unitary Councils to replace the remaining County and District Councils, together with enhanced powers for Town and Parish Councils for years. Lincolnshire would benefit from having one, two or possibly three unitaries to replace the eight first and second tier councils it has now. Then we need to devolve powers and money from the centre and to reform how we finance local government. After that, we could consider how we create a Federal United Kingdom, with Regional Assemblies in England similar to those parliaments in Northern Ireland, Wales and Scotland, with a Federal Parliament at Westminster, together with a Senate to replace the House of Lords, responsible for Foreign Affairs, Defence of the Realm, Environment and Strategic Planning, which is more or less what the Bundestag does in Germany.

So, whatever happens after October 31, or perhaps later, our decrepit system of government has got to change. We could start with a Speaker’s Conference to decide priorities and then subject ideas to a Citizens’ Assembly, which would report its findings back to Parliament. I would still rather have a government scrutinised by parliament than government by referendum. It might suit the Swiss to be governed this way, but the UK is not Switzerland. In or out of Europe there is much for us to do, because we clearly cannot blunder along as we have done for decades and, above all, we have, as a nation, or a federation of nations and regions, got to earn a living on the world stage.

To those of you, who have managed to get to the end of this piece and might be questioning my judgement, let me end with a quote from the late Robert F Kennedy;” Some men see things as they are, and ask why. I dream of things that never were and ask why not.”

John was a councillor for thirty years, finally retiring in 2017. A schoolteacher by profession, he served on the North Hykeham Town Council (1987-2011), the North Kesteven District Council (1987-1999, 2001-2007) and the Lincolnshire County Council (2001-2017). He was also a County Council member of the former Lincolnshire Police Authority for eight years until standing down in 2009. In 1997 he was the Lib Dem Parliamentary candidate for Sleaford and North Hykeham. He is currently not a member of any political party.

+ More stories