Matt Warman

By Matt Warman Boston & Skegness MP

In 2018 unemployment has hit record lows, employment record highs, and it was announced that the NHS would receive the largest single injection of funds in the service’s history.

But of course above all that it is Brexit that has dominated almost every headline. Knock on doors across Boston and Skegness and it is increasingly the case that Brexit is squeezing out even the conversations about roads and GP surgeries that usually dominate.

The challenge of Brexit is also the opportunity; I know that people voted for it locally in such numbers in part because they were optimistic about Britain’s future. The prospect of a country with its own trade policy, buying and selling globally, controlling its borders and sending less money to Brussels is one that people sought to embrace. It’s one I’m totally committed to delivering. Nobody I met in the course of the referendum believed it would be an effortless process, but the clear view was that Britain would more than profit from making the change.

Parliament’s role in that should be to come together in the national interest and make sure that Britain leaves the EU smoothly and without unnecessary disruption. The Prime Minister has worked tirelessly throughout the year to deliver a deal that will take us out of the EU while also protecting jobs and growth. It is not yet perfect, and when it comes back to Parliament it must satisfy the legitimate concerns of many of my colleagues if it is to receive the support of my fellow MPs.

If it does not, however, there is a real chance that the UK leaves the EU with an unnecessarily damaging no deal Brexit – or that we do not leave at all. I hope my colleagues in Parliament reflect seriously on the idea that undermining democracy is a very serious possibility if we were to find ourselves delaying or withdrawing Article 50, or even having a second referendum.

So the stakes for 2019 could not be higher – not just because MPs have to make sure Brexit happens and happens properly. Only by achieving that will the Government be able to devote the proper focus to the domestic agenda, be that the NHS, the police or the roads.

Those are the issues that will make a real difference to constituents in a far quicker timeframe than leaving the EU – all of them are vital, and MPs must seize the day to make sure we deliver on the opportunities at hand.

Matt Warman is the Conservative MP for the Boston and Skegness constituency.

By Matt Warman Boston & Skegness MP

There are rules of thumb for Members of Parliament writing columns for constituency papers and websites – the received wisdom is that local is always best, because there is plenty of national analysis and news in national media. And it’s usually best not to be too partisan, because most politics is not about parties; the local NHS or the roads or broadband are not issues driven by Labour versus Conservative or anyone else. And above all else it is considered unwise to risk alienating constituents by explicitly disagreeing with people.

We live, however, in extraordinary times. Nobody could pretend that the all-consuming issue is not Brexit. The privilege of representing Boston and Skegness in Parliament brings with it, I believe, a unique obligation: in the constituency that voted more than any other to leave the EU, my duty must be to do all I can to secure a path out of the EU that comes closest to delivering the promises that were made in the referendum campaign.

The UK will leave the EU on March 29. We will enter an implementation period that will take us clearly to the point where we end huge payments to the EU, where free movement ends and where we have control of our laws. We will leave the Common Fisheries Policy and the Common Agricultural Policy. These are prizes that are vital if the UK is to respect the result of the referendum.

This, unequivocally, is what Theresa May’s current, imperfect deal delivers. I do not pretend that I like the deal, which is an uncomfortable compromise. But it is nonetheless a deal that delivers on the basics, provides a platform for the future and may yet be improved. If it had been on the table two years ago, Brexiteers would have been enthusiastic for it.

Some of my constituents have said to me that it would be better to hold out for an even better, purer Brexit. To do so risks the whole project. To be absolutely clear, I believe Parliament will find a way of blocking a ‘no deal’ Brexit and if this deal is rejected it will seek to delay the process and propose a second referendum.

I don’t believe that that is in the interests of democracy itself. But I also don’t believe that people who voted for Brexit were naïve enough to think it would not involve a degree of compromise or thought that it would all be entirely straightforward. If it is pragmatism that is required to take us out of the EU, pragmatism it should be. It is no good wishing for rainbows; we must and can make a deal work in the real world.

Finally, some have suggested I should support a change in Prime Minister. At this unique moment in our national history, I believe we should focus on the key task at hand: it would be an irresponsible act of self-indulgence for the Conservative Party to put our leadership above the national interest. My relentless focus will be on making a good deal work for the UK, outside the EU.

Matt Warman is the Conservative MP for the Boston and Skegness constituency.