Avatar photo

Stefan Pidluznyj, Local Democracy Reporter

Stefan Pidluznyj, Local Democracy Reporter

Stefan is the Local Democracy Reporter covering Greater Lincolnshire. You can contact him directly with your news via email at [email protected]


Plans for new static caravans at a holiday site in Addlethorpe have been given the go-ahead despite objections from a leading county and district councillor.

The Hobbins family submitted the plans for six lodge caravans at The Laurels holiday cottage, touring caravan and fishing venue on Mill Road in the village near Ingoldmells.

Councillors previously approved 22 touring pitches on the site in December 2016.

However, the developers applied to replace six of the touring pitches with the caravans.

East Lindsey District Council’s Planning Committee approved the change of use at a meeting in Manby on Thursday, April 5.

The plans drew criticisms Addlethorpe Parish Council and from East Lindsey and Lincolnshire county councillor Colin Davie, who urged his colleagues to reject the development.

Councillor Davie, who is responsible for economy and place at the county council, said that the development would not benefit the economy, and accused the developers of increasing their own personal wealth through the project.

However, speaking at the meeting, applicant Sally Hobbins criticised Councillor Davie’s comments, stating that her family had invested over £1 million into the “quality project” and were planning to recruit more staff for the 2018 season.

She said: “The venue has a rural feel and is extremely popular. It’s far enough away to give our customers the feeling that they are at a countryside retreat.

“We have found that we have serious demand for all types of holiday homes and vacations and therefore we would like to offer lodges overlooking the first lake.

“This is not an increase in wealth as Councillor Davie implies, but efforts from a hard-working family to sustain a local business.”

Councillor Terry Aldridge, of the East Lindsey Independent Group, suggested Councillor Davie should come on the planning committee.

He said: “I would like to approve this application. It’s not detrimental to the area.”

Fellow East Lindsey Independent Group member Councillor Jim Swanson said: “I am very disappointed Councillor Davie is not here. The language in here is not becoming. The comment about the applicant already being well remunerated is not the kind of thing I would like to see a councillor say.”

Councillor Sid Dennis, Conservative member for Skegness St Clements, added: “Tourism and generating wealth on the coast is very important. This family business is second to none at what it’s doing and we should support them.”

Following the decision, Councillor Davie said that he could not believe the plans were approved, describing it as a “travesty” for residents.

He said: “Addlethorpe is a small rural village where caravan pitches outnumber residents four to one. For the last few years, East Lindsey District Council has been working on a new local plan which is close to adoption. It has been agreed between the inspector and the council that the area between Ingoldmells and Addlethorpe is to be protected from any further caravan development.

“It is simply ludicrous that at the first opportunity to put this agreed position into practice that officers and members of the council have failed to protect my residents from this application.

“If the council is not prepared to support its own agreed position then it destroys all investor confidence in the local plan and makes a mockery of the formal plan adoption process.

“While it is a travesty for my residents, this decision has huge and very negative impacts for the whole coastal area I spend a large amount of my time trying to encourage investors to take seriously.”

A district council leader and leading Lincolnshire county councillor have clashed over improvements to a Gainsborough junction and objections to a major housing development in the town.

Leader of West Lindsey District Council Jeff Summers has proposed to write to the county council demanding they agree a scheme and timetable of works for the junction of the A631 Thorndike Way and Corringham Road in Gainsborough.

The junction of Thorndike Way and Corringham Road in Gainsborough. Photo: Google Street View

His motion to fellow councillors also criticises the county council for raising highway safety concerns over a planned 750 home development north of the junction, claiming that they should be making the turn-off safer “as a matter of urgency” anyway.

However, the purpose of his motion has been called into question by Councillor Richard Davies, who is responsible for highways at Lincolnshire County Council.

Councillor Davies said that he was “puzzled” by the point of it, adding that both councils were already working together with the developer to agree their financial contributions to the potential junction improvements.

In his motion, which will be debated by West Lindsey District Council’s Full Council at a meeting in Gainsborough on Monday, April 9, Councillor Summers will say: “The junction of Thorndike Way and Corringham Road is unsafe. There have been seven serious accidents in the last few years.

“This junction is in the top five priority highway safety schemes, but Lincolnshire County Council is unable to confirm when and how it will rectify this.

“Instead, Lincolnshire County Council has raised objections in response to a planning application for the Northern Neighbourhood citing highway safety at this junction as an issue.

“The county council cannot use existing highway safety concerns as the basis of objecting to planned growth as the junction is already dangerous, contributes significantly to accidents on these roads and should be made safer as a matter of urgency.”

In response, Councillor Davies acknowledged there had been “issues” with the junction, but that the county council had already made several improvements to reduce the number of serious accidents.

He also insisted that the council had not objected to the Northern Neighbourhood development, but wanted the applicant to pay for the highways improvements and for them to be finished before people moved into the new homes.

Councillor Davies said: “For the district council to allow such a substantial development to go ahead without asking the developer to do something to mitigate the impact of the extra traffic would clearly be a backward step.

“So we have not objected to the development, but have asked West Lindsey District Council to make highways improvements a condition of the planning permission.

“In our opinion, it’s only right that the developer foots the bill for those improvements and we would also want to see the changes made before the houses are occupied.

“Our officers recently met with their West Lindsey District Council counterparts to discuss this, and there seemed to be agreement that this was the best way forward. And it is our understanding the developer is now designing those potential improvements.

“Given that everyone already appears to be working together on this, I have to say I am somewhat puzzled as to the point of Councillor Summers’ motion.”

+ More stories