Avatar photo

Lucy Rigby

lucyrigby

Lucy Rigby is Lincoln Labour's candidate to be the city's next MP. She is a solicitor and lives in central Lincoln.


Like many, I was caught by surprise last week when an opinion poll indicated that Britain may be about to disintegrate. Despite Scotland’s splitting away being a theoretical possibility since the independence referendum was called, I – perhaps naively – never truly comprehended that it might happen.

But now that possibility seems very real and the realisation that we might be close to separation has left me with an empty feeling. I feel like that because I’m British. My dad spent his career in the British Army; I was born on a British Royal Air Force base in Germany; I’ve got a British passport. My mum works for the National Health Service – “national” meaning it covers all of Britain including Scotland. If Scotland chooses to leave Britain, my country will cease to exist.

It is right that the Scots’ decision as to whether to leave Britain or not is a matter solely for them, but, this said, their decision affects me, as a Briton, deeply.

Nation states are seen be some as false constructs, often overly romanticsed, but I am nevertheless very attached to my country. I genuinely believe Britain is the best country in the world. We have British justice, respected the world over; we have a proud history of tolerance and defending liberty – within Britain and around the world; we defeated Nazism; we have a world-class health service, free at the point of use; British culture from literature to music and sport is celebrated the world over. The Labour Party – for what it’s worth I believe the greatest force for fairness that Britain has ever seen – was founded by a Scot, Keir Hardie.

It’s not very British to talk about how good it is to be British, but the point is this: these are things we achieved as Britain, they’re just as much Scottish as English or Welsh and it can’t be – as the Scottish National Party make out – that all of our shared history counts for nothing.

The SNP claim that Scotland is so substantially different from England as to warrant separation. They say that the effects of Thatcherism, unregulated markets and the unbridled individualism of the 80s have driven Scotland and England apart. But history isn’t just the 1980s. The union is over 300 years old. If Thatcherism drove a wedge between the Scots and the English, it also drove a wedge between the north and the south of Britain, and between the city of London and the rest of the country.

The SNP would have us believe that Scotland is a substantially more communitarian country than the rest of Britain, but there are areas of England – the cities of the north-west, for example – that would doubtless consider themselves just as committed to civil society. In this way, it’s slightly odd that Better Together’s campaign has been thought negative and the SNP’s positive.

Salmond’s brand of vitriolic divisiveness, pitting the Scots against the English, is as negative as it is false.

That Scotland will have a much brighter future if it remains within Britain has been made clear; an independent Scotland’s economic outlook appears very uncertain indeed. But the message that we now need to deliver is that Britain is better because of Scotland; it has been and it will be. We have more in common than divides us and we are far, far stronger together than we could be apart.

Lucy Rigby is Lincoln Labour's candidate to be the city's next MP. She is a solicitor and lives in central Lincoln.

The nature of being a football fan means that, when it comes to our national game, what I’m most bothered about is my club’s form. That ranks above all else. Therefore, although I’m aware that there are deep problems with the way football in this country is run, if my club beats Arsenal, City and Chelsea, my concern about, for example, club ownership structure tends to recede a bit.

So you’ll understand why, as a United fan, I’ve been lacking in pacifying triumphs of late and, as a consequence, had my interest in football’s ills reignited. I’m being a bit glib of course.

The reality is that British football increasingly gives the impression of being a greedy, badly run and unfair enterprise, which is becoming more and more distant from its supporters – and that reality bothers me, no matter how United are doing.

Ill number one: going to see games is prohibitively expensive. If you’re a Gooner (poor you), the cheapest season ticket you can get is over £1,000. Watching football is gradually becoming out of reach for thousands of fans, especially when coupled with the cost of getting to away grounds with high train fares and expensive fuel.

There is no better symbol of the differing interests of fans and club owners than in the way many supporters are being priced out of the game.

Secondly, too much money is being drained out of football, rather than being reinvested in clubs. Manchester United offer a depressingly perfect example: since the Glazers’ takeover in 2005, £700 million has been siphoned out of the club in interest, fees and bank charges. Of course United are just one of many UK clubs owned by single, wealthy individuals whose interest in their acquisition is considerably more short-term than those of lifelong supporters.

Which brings me to a third problem: the power of short-term financial interests is causing too much instability. Clubs going bust too often (there’ve been over 100 insolvencies in the top five divisions of the English game since 1992); clubs move cities; clubs’ assets (such as a stadium) are sold off. These can be cold financial decisions for those at the helm but for supporters, they’re often significant and/or emotional events.

The control wielded by single investors is coupled with a lack of supporters’ say in how a club is run. It’s crazy really.

The performance of a club can matter deeply to tens of thousands (sometimes millions) of people, yet the ability to exert any control over that club is often in the hands of just one investor. Clubs in the UK are more often than not companies. This legal structure would appear not to fit well with the concept of being a fan and indeed with how supporters themselves view their attachment to their club: being a fan isn’t like buying goods or services from a company; fandom is like being a member of some kind of special society or institution, or part of community with fellow supporters, or (fittingly), part of a club.

Each of these ills, and the resulting widespread dissatisfaction amongst British football fans, could be remedied in no small part by increasing the influence of supporters.

FC Barcelona, to use a famous example, is an association. It’s owned by its supporters – they’re each a member of the club. Fans vote for the executives running their club; if supporters don’t like the way the club is going, then they vote those executives out. Ticket prices are considerably below those of the Premier League and there is a recognition that the club exists to serve the interests of the fans and wider local community. All but two clubs in the Bundesliga have a similar structure, being required by law to be member-controlled. Clubs aren’t less profitable or less successful but ticket prices are low and clubs are characterised by financial stability.

Supporter influence isn’t always issue-free (an example close to home springs to mind) but I would argue that there’s both an increasing appetite for change and a growing recognition that football has an important social role against which rampant commercialism needs to be balanced.

Lucy Rigby is Lincoln Labour's candidate to be the city's next MP. She is a solicitor and lives in central Lincoln.

+ More stories