Parliament has the privilege of handling a host of issues, from foreign policy to welfare reform and – more recently – planning how best to make a success of our departure from the European Union.

Each of these is nationally important, and it is a challenge and an honour to be asked to address them on behalf of the people of Boston and Skegness. But it is sometimes the most local issues that provide an equal sense of satisfaction, and in the village of Carrington I was recently delighted to be able to help deliver something that has been missing for longer than many people can remember.

It was in all likelihood about 10 years ago that one of Carrington’s postboxes was stolen, from the Short’s Corner junction.

Over many years there was a recurring agenda item on the clerk to the parish council’s notes: get the postbox back.

When Mrs Victoria Clark took over recently, she was told that this was not a task that was likely to be achieved. Like all good parish clerks – and there are many across Lincolnshire – Mrs Clark took this to be a challenge.

I should confess that when I received the first letter about the Carrington postbox, I was not totally convinced that it was an issue I could easily resolve.

If various councillors and others had failed to get it sorted, was this something that was beyond even the reach of Westminster?

And should, in these days of email and Facebook, one less letterbox be tolerated anyway? It seemed to me that, whatever the case, the fact that this particular amenity had simply been stolen, rather than closed after consideration, meant that it should be reinstated.

Unfortunately, this view did not immediately tally with that of the Chief Executive of Royal Mail. Moya Greene informed me that her ‘senior team’ was reviewing the matter, and that my predecessor had sought to address it too. Let’s say I could hear the rustle of an issue being kicked into the long grass.

It took a host of letters, phone calls and persistence from my dedicated staff before we finally received an email: a new box was operational, and even the parish council’s offer to supply the post on which to affix it was not required.

The people of Short’s Corner – few in number but important – had their amenity restored.

I do not pretend that every issue an MP deals with is of equal weight – but there is an important principle that these small issues demonstrate.

When I stand up to speak in Parliament, it is, I hope, from a position of knowing not just what many people tell me they think of Syria or children’s service – but also from making sure that I do all I can to keep in touch with the issues that constituents tell me they care about.

Politicians are often accused of not living in the real world: postboxes, casework, surgeries and Facebook are all parts of my best efforts to make sure that I’m as approachable as I am engaged.

Matt Warman is the Conservative MP for the Boston and Skegness constituency.

There was a certain irony when a recent meeting I convened to talk about Boston’s new flood barrier was interrupted by flooding. Not, admittedly, of anything more serious than a burst main, but as a group of fishermen, myself, the Environment Agency, other river users and councillors talked about the £100m that the UK government is to invest in Boston, a knock on the door heralded the news that we “shouldn’t worry… but the water-level in the cellar is rising quite rapidly.”

In this instance, Anglian Water worked efficiently to reconnect disconnected homes, and indeed my own office, and have since been making strenuous efforts to sort the necessary permanent solution.

It was a small case study to demonstrate, however, the scale of a clean-up operation required after a small flood, and a reminder of why it is right to do all that is necessary to preclude a repeat of the carnage wreaked by the tidal surge in 2013.

With that in mind, the news that the flood barrier project is to be the subject of a public inquiry is welcome.

There is already widespread consensus that Boston needs the barrier and deserves what will be the single biggest investment of public money in the town certainly in recent times and possibly in its history.

But there are inevitably conflicting preferences on what precisely the barrier should do, how it should operate and on the details of what is a hugely complex operation.

For myself, I’m clear that there are three key aspects to this project: first, and most important, the barrier must protect people’s lives and property from the risk of flooding.

That public safety aspect is the most important single gain, and it is right that it trumps all other interests.

It would be wrong, however, to ignore the huge economic importance of the barrier. Done properly it will safeguard the fishing fleet and river users and it will protect businesses in the town as well.

This means that it unlocks potential investment in Boston and it encourages more businesses to open or expand. It underlines that infrastructure investment has both a preventative and a positive power.

Finally, there are the transformational possibilities: with water-level management of some sort Boston could become a town that faces the water, that reaps the huge benefits of all the tourism and commercial activities that come from a marina and more.

This is the true potential of a major project.

In the first phase of the barrier, it is the safety and economic security that will be to the fore.

But longer term that final aspect is also vital. I see my role as being to make sure that Boston’s bright future arrives as quickly as possible and that means convening the kind of meetings that get a host of interest groups around the table to best understand the right way forward.

The forthcoming public inquiry will provide definite answers on the right balance, and mean the building work can begin.

By the end of 2019 the barrier will be up and running.

That landmark will be a huge opportunity for Boston – but it will also be the beginning of a vital new phase, and one to which we should all look forward with excitement.

Matt Warman is the Conservative MP for the Boston and Skegness constituency.

+ More stories