‘One day I will not come home’: Lincolnshire residents demand changes to ‘death trap’ A1
Frightened Lincolnshire motorists have urged the government and Highways England to make drastic changes to the A1 at Newark following a fatal crash last week. As previously reported, the horror six-vehicle crash on March 9 claimed the life of a 52-year-old man, despite the best efforts of emergency services to rescue him. A 38-year-old man has…
Frightened Lincolnshire motorists have urged the government and Highways England to make drastic changes to the A1 at Newark following a fatal crash last week.
As previously reported, the horror six-vehicle crash on March 9 claimed the life of a 52-year-old man, despite the best efforts of emergency services to rescue him.
Inspired by Amiee’s petition, many Lincolnshire drivers have come out and spoken of their fears of driving along the now notorious stretch of road.
‘Change is overdue’
Six vehicles were involved in the crash. Photo: Janos A
Stamford man Adam Readwin was just metres from the crash.
He said: “I knew instantly the cause as the junction causes so much backlog onto the A1.”
Other people who signed the petition said that they knew the man who was tragically killed.
Karen Nye from Grantham said: “The man who needlessly died was my friend and work colleague for 17 years.”
Sleaford resident Julie Keir added: “It was my old boss who was killed in this accident.”
‘Used to fear for my life’
Photo: Janos A
Many drivers spoke of their constant fear of driving around close to the A1 and A46.
Rachael Norton from North Hykeham said: “I used to travel to Grantham from Lincoln to work and almost everyday I used to be queuing on the A1 and at this slip road to get off.
“I honestly used to fear for my life, hoping that the cars behind could see that there was a queue to get off.
“I had a small car and seeing lorries speeding towards you in the rear view mirror makes this one of the scariest junctions I’ve ever come across.”
Grantham resident Dianne Taylor echoed this view, adding: “I use this road daily and stopping on the A1 whist lorries come towards you is very scary.”
Julianne Taylor, also from Grantham, said: “I drive this route everyday for work. I have a partner and six-year-old little boy.
“I want to make it home to them every night.”
‘One day I will be the one not coming home’
The scale of the crash. Photo: Janos A
Lincoln man Steve Wilson has spoken of his fears about the junction unless something is done to improve it.
He said: “One day I will be the one not coming home from work.”
Lauren Sheen from Grantham was also blunt in her assessment of that section of the A1.
She said: “I hate that road. Scares me. It’s dangerous and a recipe for death.”
Spotted an error? Please notify us by selecting that text and pressing Ctrl+Enter.
The Lincolnite welcomes your views. All comments are reactively-moderated and must obey the house rules. Please stay on topic and be respectful of other readers.
The Lincolnite welcomes your views. All comments are reactively-moderated and must obey the house rules. Please stay on topic and be respectful of other readers.
COVID-19 outbreaks with up to 100 cases at two South Holland care homes pushed up the district’s infection rate over the weekend.
Leader of South Holland District Council, Cllr Lord Gary Porter, put the spike down to outbreaks in two care facilities, one being a children’s care home.
He said: “Obviously the numbers are much higher than I would like. The increase is largely driven by two large isolated care home cases with almost 100 between them.”
“I don’t know if the adult care home had the jabs done before the outbreak, but the children’s one wouldn’t have.
“What the figures do show is that it is still vitally important that everyone continues to make sure that they protect themselves as best they can.”
He added: “The vaccine rollout has started but will be months away from having a major impact on tackling the virus.”
Meanwhile, South Kesteven dropped after two weeks from the top spot to third highest infection rate in Greater Lincolnshire with 299.1 per 100,000 of the population.
Lincoln has remained the same since Friday, but in doing so has moved up to first place with the highest infection rate in Greater Lincolnshire of 327.3.
Some 14 days later, South Kesteven reduced its infection rate and went from first to third place in the county.
However, it is still above the Greater Lincolnshire average of 229 as of January 17.
In national news, analysis by the Press Association has shown 279 out of 315 local areas in England have seen a fall in case rates in the last seven days up to January 13.
Since January 13, the national average has fallen further from 654.9 to 537.9 on January 17.
Greater Lincolnshire’s infection rates from Jan 11 to Jan 17. | Data: Gov UK / Table: James Mayer for The Lincolnite
Lincoln MP Karl McCartney said that a complaint which resulted in him being formally warned for promoting his role as a magistrate ahead of the 2019 general election was “politically motivated”.
However, he said he “would not want to have this argument again” and called for clearer guidance before the next national poll.
Mr McCartney revealed the complaint was made by a “fellow Lincolnshire Magistrate” and University of Lincoln lecturer, but did not name them.
“I believe, and always have done, that it is imperative electors should be able to judge an election candidate and their integrity through what they have done, do, and have been involved with,” he said.
“My public service as a school governor, various positions and trusteeships with a plethora of charities, and my service as a magistrate on three different benches is a matter of public record, as is my former joint chairmanship of the All-Party Parliamentary Group for magistrates.”
“I do not believe in censorship,” he added.
Karl McCartney’s “About Karl” section on his website mentions the role.
Mr McCartney has been a Justice of the Peace for nearly 25 years.
He said the Lord Chancellor in 2005 had changed the guidance and rules and that they had not reverted back since.
He said “the reality is that I proved to the panel […] there was nothing to complain about, as the guidance from 2005 is still relevant.”
However, the panel came to a different conclusion, giving him a formal warning.
“The British judicial system has an onus on the accuser, and those trying the accused, of proving wrongdoing. If not proven or if there is benefit of doubt, then the finding is surely ‘not guilty’,” said Mr McCartney.
However, he added: “Saying all the above, I would not want to have this argument again. If the guidance is made clearer before the next general election, I will of course review my mentioning of being a JP in election literature.”
Here is Karl McCartney’s statement in full:
“Over a year ago one fellow Lincolnshire Magistrate, who is a Lecturer at the University of Lincoln, made a politically motivated complaint that a leaflet from me prior to the December 2019 General Election had made it clear I had served, and still am, a Justice of the Peace, a Magistrate.
“I believe, and always have done that it is imperative electors should be able to judge an election candidate and their integrity through what they have done, do, and have been involved with. My public service as a school governor, various positions & Trusteeships with a plethora of charities, and my service as a Magistrate on three different Benches is a matter of public record, as is my former Joint Chairmanship of the All-Party Parliamentary Group for Magistrates. I do not believe in censorship.
“The Lord Chancellor in 2005 agreed with me, and I received direct notification from him that he was imminently changing the Guidance and Rules for the Judiciary, and Magistrates, which he did. For the record, he did not reprimand me. That guidance has not been rescinded, nor usurped, by subsequent Lord Chancellors, including the current one. If I had done wrong and refused to admit it, I would surely have been removed as a Magistrate by the Civil Servants and those acting on their behalf.
“The conclusion is clear to those who are aware of the full facts. I have always said that if a Justice of the Peace uses their position as a Magistrate to their own betterment, or to offer favour, then they have no business being a Magistrate. After a year of procrastination, the reality is that I proved to the Panel representing the Department that there was nothing to complain about, as the Guidance from 2005 is still relevant. Unfortunately, that does not fit with the conclusion they came to, hence the statement published on their website.
“The British judicial system has an onus on the accuser, and those trying the accused, of proving wrongdoing. If not proven or if there is benefit of doubt, then the finding is surely ‘not guilty’. Saying all the above, I would not want to have this argument again. If the guidance is made clearer before the next General Election, I will of course review my mentioning of being a JP in election literature. However, it is quite clear that many people in Lincoln are aware that I have been a Magistrate for nearly 25 years.”